CTU expert persona
The dossier is drafted under the persona of a court-registered forensic IT expert (CTU, art. 359 Italian Code of Criminal Procedure), with magistrate-grade language and complete forensic vocabulary.
Methodology
Every dossier follows ISO 27037, NIST SP 800-86 and ENISA ETL. The result: a document a postal-police investigator and a magistrate can use.
Last methodology review: 2026-06-02
Six structural guarantees baked into every dossier — before any content is written.
The dossier is drafted under the persona of a court-registered forensic IT expert (CTU, art. 359 Italian Code of Criminal Procedure), with magistrate-grade language and complete forensic vocabulary.
Every claim is anchored to at least one canonical evidence (cf. E-N). The appendix catalog lists artefacts and tool outputs with SHA-256.
The PDF is sealed with SHA-256 and anchored to a Write-Once-Read-Many audit chain: any later modification would break the chain in a detectable way.
Forensic tools, versions and vendors are declared at the foot of the document so the analysis remains reproducible years later.
Every page carries a Traffic Light Protocol marking to govern document sharing, following international best practice.
A single pipeline analyses text, images, PDF, email, URL, crypto addresses and phone numbers, applying the right forensic framework per modality.
The canonical structure of a Mythos dossier — the same one your counsel would file with the prosecutor.
Expert synthesis of the case: subject, principal signals, verdict and confidence percentage. Cites at least two E-N references.
For every detected dimension (impersonation, tampering, reputation, etc.) the signal and its technical-legal implication, in magistrate-grade prose.
Evidence-by-evidence analysis: type, size, truncated hash, observed metadata (EXIF, headers, structure), tool signals and expert interpretation for each E-N.
Chronological custody events (acquisition, hashing, analysis, generation, WORM anchor) with UTC timestamps and responsible actor.
Risk level plus confidence percentage with the list of converging evidence justifying it. HIGH-RISK threshold: at least 3 independent signals.
Prioritised actions across three levels: P0 within 24h, P1 within 7 days, P2 consolidation. Every recommendation is tied to at least one evidence.
Expert's declaration (no conflict of interest, limits of static analysis) and notice that the document does not replace legal counsel.
Reference frameworks (ISO 27037, NIST SP 800-86, ENISA ETL), 5-stage pipeline, signal-convergence criteria and reproducibility guarantees.
Table of all evidences E-1 ... E-N with type, SHA-256 (when applicable), acquisition timestamp and short label.
Here is what a complete Mythos dossier looks like. Synthetic teaching case, real structure.
Anatomy of a dossier
Every Mythos dossier is structured as a CTU-grade forensic expert report: cover page with verdict and verification QR, automatic table of contents, synoptic indicator matrix, E-1...E-N evidence catalog with SHA-256, and chronological chain of custody.


44 KB · 19 pages · A4
Anonymised. Synthetic teaching case (WhatsApp "hi mum" + IBAN + tampered ID).
The same layout your counsel would file with the prosecutor. No marketing template.
The frameworks and regulations the methodology rests on.
Every Mythos dossier carries a QR code on its cover that opens /verify/<id>. The page republishes the SHA-256 hash of the PDF and its position in the WORM audit chain: anyone can confirm, even years later, that the document has not been tampered with.
19-page PDF, synthetic teaching case (WhatsApp "hi mum" + IBAN + tampered ID). Real structure, anonymised data.
Download example (PDF, 44 KB)